Anton: They Can't Let Him (Trump) Back In

From Michael Anton at Compact Mag

The people who really run the United States of America have made it clear that they can’t, and won’t, if they can help it, allow Donald Trump to be president again. In fact, they made this clear in 2020, in a series of public statements. Simply for quoting their words in an essay for The American Mind, I was mercilessly mocked and attacked. But they were quite clear. Trump won’t be president at noon, Jan. 20, 2021, even if we have to use the military to drag him out of there.

If the regime felt that strongly back then, imagine how they feel now. But you don’t have to imagine. They tell you every day. Liz Cheney, Trump’s personal Javert, has said that the 45th president is literally the greatest threat facing America today - greater than China, than our crashing economy, than our unraveling civil society.

That’s rhetoric, of course, but it isn’t merely that. It’s safer, and generally more accurate, to assume that your adversaries mean what they say.

If you doubt this, ask yourself: When was the last time they acted more moderately than they talk?

Even if it is just rhetoric, the words nonetheless portend turbulence. “He who says A must say B.” The logic of statement A inevitably leads to action B, even if the speaker of A didn’t really mean it, or did mean it, but still didn’t want B. Her followers won’t get the irony and, enthused by A, will insist on B.

Take some time to listen to the mainstream media. It doesn’t have to be long; five minutes should do. Then spend another five or so reading the statements of prominent politicians other than Trump. To round it out, sacrifice another five on leading intellectuals. It should become abundantly clear: They all have said A and so must say—and do—B.

And B is that Trump absolutely must not be allowed to take office on Jan. 20, 2025.

Why? They say Jan. 6. But their determination began much earlier.

And just what is so terrible about Trump anyway? I get many of his critics’ points, I really do. I hear them all the time from my mother. But even if we were to stipulate them all, do Trump’s faults really warrant tearing the country apart by shutting out half of it from the political process?

Love him or hate him, during Trump’s presidency, the economy was strong, markets were up, inflation was under control, gas prices were low, illegal border crossings were down, crime was lower, trade deals were renegotiated, ISIS was defeated, NATO allies were stepping up, and China was stepping back (a little). Deny all that if you want to. The point here is that something like 100 million Americans believe it, strongly, and are bewildered and angered by elite hatred for the man they think delivered it.

Nor was Trump’s record all that radical—much less so than that of Joe Biden, who is using school-lunch funding to push gender ideology on poor kids, to cite but one example. Trump’s core agenda—border protection, trade balance, foreign restraint—was quite moderate, both intrinsically and in comparison to past Republican and Democratic precedent. And that’s before we even get to the fact that Trump neglected much of his own agenda in favor of the old Chamber of Commerce, fusionist, Reaganite, Conservatism, Inc., agenda. Corporate tax cuts, deregulation, and bombing Syria: These are all things Trump’s base doesn’t want, but the oligarchs desperately do, which Trump gave them. And still they try to destroy him.

Again, why? I think it’s because, while Trump’s core MAGA agenda is decidedly not outside the historic bipartisan mainstream, it is well outside the present regime’s core interests. Our rulers’ wealth and power rise with open borders, trade giveaways, and endless war. Trump, at least in principle, and often in practice, threatens all three. The old America—the one in which Republicans cared about the heartland and weren’t solely valets to corporate power, Democrats were pro-worker and anti-war, and Bill Clinton and The New York Times could advocate border security—is in the process of being replaced, if it hasn’t already been, by one in which there is only one acceptable opinion on not just these, but all other issues.

Anti-Trump hysteria is in the final analysis not about Trump. The regime can’t allow Trump to be president not because of who he is (although that grates), but because of who his followers are. That class—Angelo Codevilla’s “country class”—must not be allowed representation by candidates who might implement their preferences, which also, and above all, must not be allowed. The rubes have no legitimate standing to affect the outcome of any political process, because of who they are, but mostly because of what they want.

Complaints about the nature of Trump are just proxies for objections to the nature of his base. It doesn’t help stabilize our already twitchy situation that those who bleat the loudest about democracy are also audibly and visibly determined to deny a real choice to half the country. “No matter how you vote, you will not get X”—whether X is a candidate or a policy—is guaranteed to increase discontent with the present regime.

People I have known for 30 years, many of whom still claim the label “conservative,” will no longer speak to me—because I supported Trump, yes, but also because I disagree on trade, war, and the border. They call not just my positions, but me personally, unadulterated evil. I am not an isolated case. There are, as they say, “many such cases.” How are we supposed to have “democracy” when the policies and candidates my side wants and votes for are anathema and can’t be allowed? How are we supposed to live together with the constant demonization from one side against the other blaring 24/7 from the ruling class’s every propaganda organ? Why would we want to?

More to the point: How are we supposed to get through the next two and a half years? The regime would prefer to get its way via the path of least resistance. The ideal situation, at least for those of a less punitive cast of mind who would be satisfied seeing Trump gone but not necessarily in jail, would be for Trump to just walk away. But how likely is that? He doesn’t, to say the least, seem primed for a graceful exit in which he passes the baton to Ron DeSantis (or whomever). Even if he did, how many in his base would convince themselves that the fix was somehow in? “They threatened his children,” etc. That kind of thinking leads not to demoralization but to outrage. That might be irrational, but this isn’t a math competition; it’s politics in a hyper-partisan, supercharged time.

Since the long goodbye has about as much chance as Kamala Harris completing a sentence without cackling,

Plan A is to use the Jan. 6 show trials to make it impossible for Trump to run again, or barring that, to win again.

But that isn’t working; at least, not well enough.

They may have dented Trump a little in opinion polling, but not nearly enough to prevent him from getting the GOP nomination. Perhaps they still can; I doubt it, but who knows? But more likely, even if they do further damage, Trump will have plenty of time to get his numbers back up.

And the ruling class will surely help him in that endeavor by being ever-more radical, hateful, and incompetent. They have shown time and again that there is no moderation in them. They can’t let up even a single mile per hour, not even when easing back is in their clear interest. Whether they are driven by the demands of their base, their own internal conviction, or some supernatural force, I couldn’t say.

Plan B is for the Jan. 6 committee to lay the groundwork for an indictment of Trump.

The Justice Department is already leaking that “seditious conspiracy” might be the charge.

Now, I personally believe that such a charge would be ludicrous. Seditious conspiracy, when it is charged at all, which it rarely was before Jan. 6, is typically reserved for the likes of Omar “Blind Sheikh” Abdel-Rahman, who tried to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993. And they are going to try it against a former president, for phone calls and texts ambiguously connected to a protest in which many walked through doors held open by Capitol Police, minimal property damage occurred, the only people who died were unarmed protesters, and which may have been a setup, or at least egged-on, by the feds.

I am under no illusion that I’m going to convince regime apparatchiks of any of this. However, if any are reading, I would ask them the following. I know you think it’s perfectly obvious that “Trump Is Guilty!” and that anyone who doesn’t agree is not merely insane, but A Danger to the Republic. But just as I know I can’t convince you, I also know that you can’t convince 100 million Trump supporters. Do you realize that, too? Do you consider it a feature, not a bug?

Moreover, if the regime goes forward with this, it’s going to try him in the District of Columbia’s 77 percent Democratic and 92 percent virulently anti-Trump jury pool, which lately has been acquitting obvious Democratic miscreants and convicting Republicans on silly charges that never used to have been brought in the first place.

It’s just a fact—perhaps, to many, a baleful fact—but nevertheless a fact that somewhere between a third and half the country is going to find this totally illegitimate and be outraged by it.

I know what some of our masters are thinking because they are already saying it: Justice must be done, come what may. We must stand on principle, consequences be damned. This sounds noble in the abstract.

Is it? I suspect some of them are thinking: 

This is win-win for us. If we convict him, or damage him enough that he can’t run, and there isn’t a huge backlash, then mission accomplished. Or if there is, well, those people were already, or soon-to-be, insurrectionists and so we will be justified in unleashing the security state against them. Indeed, there are benefits to flushing them out now, before they are fully organized for the “Second Civil War” we know the insurrectionists are already plotting.

At any rate, a conviction would all but ensure a Senate vote under Article I, Section 3, making Trump constitutionally ineligible to run (at least half the Republicans would sign on).

But what if, somehow, Trump is acquitted or gets his case tossed out?

Then I think you will see the same indignant reaction, but from the other side. Suddenly it will be Blue America declaring all our institutions, and especially the courts, illegitimate. You might even see some attempts at blue secession, e.g., “Calexit.”

Plan C, if none of this works, is to have Trump declared ineligible under the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment.

This is riskier than Plan B. If they couldn’t get a Senate vote in favor (and, absent a conviction, I don’t think they could), it would come down to a mere court opinion.

If you think Trump’s base will howl over a conviction in a DC kangaroo court, wait until you see their reaction to some Democratic-appointed appeals judge saying Trump can’t run. Even if the regime got the Supreme Court to uphold that 9-0 (and they won’t), Trump’s base won’t accept it.

Plan D—just beat him at the ballot box—is also risky. The country is in desperate shape. Biden is enormously unpopular. Harris is spectacularly unpopular. Getting rid of one of them will be hard. Getting rid of both? The first black, South-Asian, and female vice president and heir apparent? Does anyone think the race-and-sex-obsessed Democratic base of 2024 is going to tolerate that?

And then who do they replace them with? Gavin Newsom? A ciswhite male? Even if they can get past that non-trivial problem, which they can’t, Newsom has no appeal outside deep-blue America. I’m not saying he would certainly lose, but it’s dicey as hell, especially with a demoralized base and the very strong likelihood that the state he governs will be deep in recession by election time.

Plan E is to cheat. I know what you are thinking. But I’m not talking about Dominion voting machines. I mean the kind of “pre-cheating” that the regime boasts about as “election fortification”: change the rules in advance in ways that favor Democrats and hurt Republicans, especially in swing states. There is no question that they will do this. Why wouldn’t they? It worked last time, and the more overt cheating they can avoid, the better.

They are already using the federal government to thumb the scale in favor of Democrats. Biden’s Executive Order 14019, “Promoting Access to Voting,” requires “every federal agency to submit a plan to register voters and encourage voter participation. It also required agencies to form strategies to invite nongovernmental third parties to register voters.” That is to say, a federal takeover of state elections by the Biden administration. This is a replay, with federal power, of the $400 million in “Zuckerbucks”—money donated by the tech-oligarch founder of Facebook—that pre-rigged the last election, but this time with taxpayer dollars, a White House aide (Susan Rice) coordinating, and cabinet agencies like Housing and Urban Development implementing, in conjunction with leftwing NGOs. That combination will be hard to beat.

But suppose it is. There is always cheating-cheating. If you believed that Trump presents an unprecedented threat to the republic, would you really object to a few boxes of extra ballots falling off trucks near vote-counting headquarters in Las Vegas, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Detroit, Philadelphia, and Atlanta? When the Survival of Our Democracy Is on the Line?

One has to tip one’s hat to the rhetorical disadvantage they have imposed on us. All questioning of any election they win is denounced as paranoid, unpatriotic, “racist,” and a threat to the integrity of the process. (Never mind that they always do it when the right wins; see, for instance, 2000, 2004, and 2016.) The questionable practices such as late-night ballot dumps that lead to our questions are never explained, much less ended. They get to engage in shenanigans that make elections look fishy; we get blamed for saying they look fishy. When we point out that, hey, something looks off there, the response is invariably: How dare you sow doubt about the election! You are undermining confidence in Our Democracy™. Not their shenanigans, but our doubts undermine confidence.

But there is reason to wonder if they can get away with it next time. Whatever happened in 2020, a supermajority of Republicans doesn’t believe that the election was on the level. The regime is extremely worried about this, which is why the propaganda on it is so intense. They know that to pull off a win in 2024, and have it accepted by the 2020 doubters, the next election is at least going to have to look a lot cleaner than the last. Making it look cleaner is hard to do without actually making it cleaner. The downside to that, though, is obvious.

So the choice before them is: Do what(ever) they did last time—and more so, if necessary—and risk an even bigger reaction, or take their chances that they can win a fair fight. (The latter assumes that they have complete control of their minions who run elections at the local level.) But to repeat a point: Perhaps they consider the reaction a feature, not a bug?

Which leaves Plan F, which they have already sketched in broad outlines. I don’t know exactly what form it will take, but they have made clear that “under no circumstance” can Trump be allowed to take office again. Among the “circumstances” covered by the word “no” would seem to be an Electoral College majority, or a tie followed by a House vote in Trump’s favor.

What happens then? Well, in the words of the “Transition Integrity Project,” a Soros-network-linked collection of regime hacks who in 2020 gamed out their strategy for preventing a Trump second term, the contest would become “a street fight, not a legal battle.”

Again, their words, not mine.

But allow me to translate: The 2020 summer riots, but orders of magnitude larger, not to be called off until their people are secure in the White House.

On Sept. 20, 1911, the RMS Olympic—sistership of the ill-fated Titanic—collided with the Royal Navy cruiser HMS Hawke, despite both vessels traveling at low speeds, in visual contact with one another for 80 minutes. “It was,” writes maritime historian John Maxtone-Graham, “one of those incredible convergences, in full daylight on a calm sea within sight of land, where two normally operated vessels steamed blithely to a point of impact as though mesmerized.”

Our sea isn’t calm, nor are our vessels normally operated. But we do seem headed for a point of impact, with the field of vision before us as clear as it was on that day.

And the regime isn’t changing course. It must want this—or else is so high on its own supply that it can’t see what it is doing.

Rest assured, if what I fear might happen, happens, we will be blamed for it.

And the fire next time will make their reaction to Jan. 6 look like a marshmallow roast. I don’t know which possibility is scarier: that they haven’t thought any of this through, or that they have.

Total Rot, Corruption and Lies: the FBI Entrapped Americans in Bullcrap Gretchen Whitmer Phony "Kidnapping" Case

  

If this doesn't make your blood boil, nothing will.  This is just the tip of the iceberg.  Youtube link here.

You can rest assured that the entirely corrupt FBI was central to the January 6th "insurrection hoax" too.  Additionally I'll be willing to bet that the FBI was involved in a smear campaign against Trump's visit to Charlottesville.  Anytime Trump announced a rally in advance, it allowed the US Government to plan an "operation" or a hoax to smear Trump and his supporters.

Also see The Despicable, Shameful Democrat "Fine People" Hoax

Although I was wrong that Biden was not elected (in a fair election) but I couldn't have imagined that the election cheating would have been so bad, I wrote a rant to a confused Leftist in September 2019:

"Everyone knows that the Democrats are desperate to steal the election. First of all, if you can go to Starbucks with masks, you can go vote in person. But no! There will be massive DEMOCRATIC fraud with bullshit ballots. It’s already coming to light with discarded ballots! Anyone with a brain knows that it’s Democrats that are the biggest liars and cheaters in the world—right alongside all the Communists. Candidate Bloomberg just jumped in to “bribe” convicted felons to vote by paying off their criminal debts in Florida. Are you OK with that? How desperate are these people? Answer: VERY. Democrats are rightly going to the ash-heap of history. Repubs are not much better, but Dems are much more deranged. Dementia Joe will not be elected, nor should he. He’s a total joke at this point.

It is Democrats that have tried seditiously to overturn their 2016 election defeat with lies, false accusations, phony dossiers. The entire Mueller Russia hoax was a completely obvious joke if it wasn’t such a Constitutional travesty.. All of the actors in the Russia Hoax scandal should already be in jail or executed. They are all traitors. People like Hillary, Obama, Comey, Rosenstein, Mueller, Podesta, Rice, Brennan, Clapper, Strock, Schiff and many others should already have been arrested for Treason or Sedition and/or other applicable crimes and sent to military trials. Personally, I think that this country should bring back the public guillotine to behead these traitors. That’s how outrageous their crimes are. Lying to the FISA court, all the Media lies and liars—all based on NOTHING. It’s all been demonstrably proven as lies and smears. It’s the only thing Democrats are good at. .

Everything is a hoax or lies with the Democrats. Speaking of lies, Black Lives Matter is all based on lies. Hands up, don’t shoot was all lies. That the US is a racist country is a lie. That police kill blacks disproportionately is a lie. What BLM stands for now is a lie. BLM is rapidly being turned into a “terrorist” organization in deed, thought and practice. They are promoting violence, thuggery and destruction along with Antifa across the nation. Blacks ruin everything. So it’s no wonder that BLM is now a criminal and violent source of anarchy across the nation– all because they believe in a bunch of lies!!

Here’s another good dose of truth for you: In the BLM website, there’s a lot of nice words that mean nothing. But nothing can cover up the real intent of these people. They think Trayvon Martin, George Floyd, Eric Garner and Michael Brown were all “murdered” without reason despite the result of trials and due process that say something entirely different. All these “victims” were so upstanding and angelic according to Left-wing media. Michael Brown was a horrible and violent thug who committed suicide by cop after robbing and assaulting a convenience store clerk just minutes before attacking officer Wilson TWICE! Ferguson shows what a total disaster that black community is, Obama’s DoJ found out that 16,000 out of 21,000 residents in Ferguson had outstanding arrest warrants! Do you really think it’s any different in any or ALL the other black shit-holes?? These people cannot exist in any kind of civilized society. And why was Zimmerman even working at Martin’s complex?? Because of rampant crime in that community of course! Crime is rampant in every black community. Democrats are the party of massively stupid and criminal blacks. Non-criminal blacks should vote for Trump. And they might!

The Charlottesville “fine people” hoax is all a proven lie if you read the transcript of Trump’s actual remarks. The Russia hoax. All of the widely reported and discredited “hate crime” hoaxes of which none are true. CNN aired a program called “nation of hate” where they tried to portray white America as a bunch of haters! What a joke!

That dementia Joe Biden is the candidate is itself a hoax. If elected, Biden will step down and the least popular candidate during the Dem.primaries, Kamala, will be President. Their entire strategy is “bait and switch.” Despicable!

Biden WON’T be elected .All of the polling is as wrong as 2016, all to try and manipulate the election and to create unrest when it doesn’t happen. All of the social media and polling companies are manipulating the election right now AGAINST TRUMP. People are not as dumb as the Democrat leadership. They can see what’s happening.

Democrats have now associated themselves now with domestic unrest, much of it orchestrated by shadowy organizations funded by scumbags like Soros. Democrats are now the party of lies, phony causes, domestic unrest and violence. People will not vote for them, nor should they. Welcome to the ash-heap of history!

Republicans weren’t hellbent on removing Obama when he was elected. Republicans can accept election results, but not Democrats!"

Wyoming Voters Politely Unleash on CNN Reporter

Maybe there is hope if we can stop vote theft in the next election (but don't bet on it).  The Dominion Obfuscation machines would have to be outlawed in favor of transparent and simple optical scanner counters (or similar) whose only function is to count ballot information AND NOTHING ELSE.

 Here's the video at CNN (Link here)

Argentina’s Economy Collapses

From Martin Armstrong at Armstrong Economics:

Argentina’s economy has collapsed. Around 57% of adults in the nation are currently unemployed. The Socialist nation has programs in place to compensate, costing the country around $6 million daily. However, socialism no longer works when you run out of other people’s money. July’s inflation report showed an uptick over 60%.

Harry Lorenzo, chief finance officer of Income Based Research, told The Epoch Times, that the government’s constant spending has exacerbated the problem ten-fold. “The Argentine government has been grappling with a collapsing economy for some time now. The main reason for this is the government’s unsustainable spending, which has been funded in part by generous welfare programs,” Lorenzo stated. This is the same issue we see in the US, Canada, Europe, and elsewhere when governments spend without the intention of ever paying off their debt.

Argentina has defaulted on seven separate occasions since gaining independence in 1816. Speaking more recently, Argentina’s economy was already in ruin in the 1980s when they faced a serious debt crisis, and the currency became worthless. Inflation reached 2,600% in 1989, and the nation experienced hyperinflation into 1990. They decided to peg the Argentine peso against the USD in the late 1990s, which proved disastrous. Never in the history of economics has a peg survived because the economy is not a flat line.

By 2001, the peso was completely devalued. US Treasury bonds and Argentine government bonds rose 5,000 bps – bank runs ensued. There was an immediate freeze on bank deposits that December and the people were left with nothing. The International Monetary Fund simultaneously announced it would no longer support Argentina and cut them off from funding. This is when the nation lost its last tie to any foreign capital. The nation had no choice but to default once again at the end of December.

Various leaders, whoever could stick with the job, promised that the government would provide the people with basic needs. Nearly 60% of the nation was below the poverty line by 2002. By 2010, Argentina restructured 92% of its debt. The nation tried to remove trade restrictions and attract investors – but who would want their debt? The IMF granted Argentina one of the largest bailout packages in history in 2018, which totaled $57 billion. The IMF again agreed to restructure $44 billion for the nation in January of this year.

The problem with social programs is that there is never enough money. Rising inflation has increased the poverty level, and the average person can no longer afford an abundance of basic necessities such as food. The people of Argentina have been on strike for months, many refusing to work. The government promised them social programs in exchange for a cut of their pay. Argentina’s economy minister, Martin Guzmán, resigned at the beginning of the month. The Argentine peso continues to decline against the dollar, pushed down further by recent Fed rate hikes. This is what happens when governments spend recklessly, peg their failing currency, and promise the people security that they cannot provide.

[Doug here: the "black market" rate for the Argentina Peso has been plunging again and is now over 300 per USD while the "official" rate is about 175.  There is a real collapse going on here.  Don't be surprised if this turns into another "Sri Lanka" in the very near future.

The most annoying thing is that I have met a few Argentinians living here in Texas. During the 2016 election season they were ENTIRELY UNABLE TO SEE that Hillary was EXACTLY the same animal as Christina DeKirchner of Argentina who has COMPLETELY wrecked that country AND STILL IS!!!  They were entirely unable to see that the non-politician Trump was a plausible answer to the grift and corruption of the professional politicians.  They had NO ABILITY whatsoever in seeing or even suspecting that Hillary or Obama are exactly the type of politician that brings ruin to any country including Argentina, Venezuela and the US. 

There is literally no hope there--- just death and destruction with the top politicians expropriating ALL THE WEALTH.  Why?  Because those people have all the wrong ideas, all the time.  It's been that way for nearly 100 years and countless country debt defaults.  There is a cost for those that never learn or who are apparently too stupid to learn. 

Lower average intelligence in these South and Central American nations/populations will not permanently support real democracy, real freedom, real prosperity, organized civil life or any competent politicians.  Instability is all they will ever know (to varying degrees) for probably 100s of years.  The same can be said for all of Africa, most of the Middle East and, indeed, 90% of the world.  The worldwide average IQ is estimated at 82 to 85. This doesn't mean that these people are bad or in any way despicable.  In fact most of these 3rd world populations are very courteous, kind and enjoyable to meet and interact.  I've traveled to about 45 countries on 6 continents and find most people are very sweet/kind despite somewhat unfortunate genetic heritages.   

But I will exclude from that generalization much of the US Black population; who just keep sinking into a morass of depravity, lies, delusion, death and crime thanks to their Democrat masters.]

Ron Paul: You Were Scammed: Covid Lies from Deborah Birx

 

 

 

After two years of unprecedented government tyranny in the name of fighting a virus, the prime instigators of this infamy are walking free, writing books, and openly pretending they never said the things they clearly said over and over.

Take Trump’s White House Covid response coordinator Deborah Birx, for example. She was, as the Brownstone Institute’s Jeffrey Tucker points out in a recent article, the principal architect of the disastrous “lockdown” policy that destroyed more lives than Covid itself. Birx knew that locking a country down in response to a virus was a radical move that would never be endorsed. So, as she admits in her new book, so she lied about it.

She sold the White House on the out-of-thin-air “fifteen days to slow the spread” all the while knowing there was no evidence it would do any such thing. As she wrote in her new book, Silent Invasion, “I didn’t have the numbers in front of me yet to make the case for extending it longer, but I had two weeks to get them.”

She was playing for time with no evidence. As it turns out, she was also destroying the lives of millions of Americans. The hysteria she created led to countless businesses destroyed, countless suicides, major depressions, drug and alcohol addictions. It led to countless deaths due to delays in treatment for other diseases. It may turn out to be the most deadly mistake in medical history.

As she revealed in her book, she actually wanted to isolate every single person in the United States! Writing about how many people would be allowed to gather, she said: “If I pushed for zero (which was actually what I wanted and what was required), this would have been interpreted as a ‘lockdown’—the perception we were all working so hard to avoid.”

She wanted to prevent even two people from meeting. How is it possible that someone like this came to gain so much power over our lives? One virus and we suddenly become Communist China?

Last week in a Fox News interview she again revealed the extent of her treachery. After months of relentlessly demanding that all Americans get the Covid shots, she revealed that the “vaccines” were not vaccines at all!

“I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection,” she told Fox. “And I think we overplayed the vaccines. And it made people then worry that it’s not going to protect against severe disease and hospitalization.”

So when did she know this? Did she know it when she told ABC in late 2020 that “this is one of the most highly-effective vaccines we have in our infectious disease arsenal. And so that’s why I’m very enthusiastic about the vaccine”?

If she knew all along that the “vaccines” were not vaccines, why didn’t she tell us? Because, as she admits in her book, she believes it’s just fine to lie to people in order to get them to do what she wants.

She admits that she employed “subterfuge” against her boss – President Donald Trump – to implement Covid policies he opposed. So it should be no surprise that she lied to the American people about the efficacy of the Covid shots.

The big question now, after what appears to be a tsunami of vaccine-related injuries, is will anyone be forced to pay for the lies and subterfuge? Will anyone be held to account for the lives lost for the arrogance of the Birxes and Faucis of the world?

Climate Non-Emergency; Corrupt, Stupid Politicians are the BIGGEST Danger to YOU, the World and Civilization

The insane and massively incompetent "Joe Biden" junta is planning to declare a "climate emergency," based on flawed government-paid research and giving the biggest morons in the world more control over your life. They want to shut down high energy-density oil, gas and coal, which fueled 150 years of human development raising billions out of  poverty through the industrial revolution and much higher standards of living.  

What the climate bullshitters want will send the world back to the dark ages and financial collapse.

Total fools and idiots, the corrupt, lying, illegitimate "Bolsheviks" who "occupy" the federal government want to subtitute intermittent, low quality and expensive solar/wind for truly reliable supplies. Wind and solar only take a small role in our current electric power mix, but anything more than about 15% of electric power from wind/solar is very difficult to manage and still provide reliable power to the public as Texas found out in a cold wave last February when wind energy failed the grid and left 10s of millions of customers freezing cold for 3 days. 

What 99.9% of people don't know is:

1. Even if you eventually added 50 to 70% low quality, intermittent source electric power generation (expensive, not practical, unreliable) you would still need basically 100% backup by fossil fuel producers who would need subsidies to stay in a standby mode. Power prices basically double or triple. Germany retail power cost is TRIPLE the US Average.
   
2. the real punchline is that electric power is only 30% of the total energy consumption our country requires. 
3. The other 70% of total energy our country requires is for diesel powered locomotives, mining equiment, farming, transportation, trucks, industrial production and all the activities in the economy. All of this energy requires high density petroleum fuels, especially diesel. And all plastics, synthetic fabric/materials and many materials for household or industrial use are all based on petroleum or gas.
4. Therefore, even if you doubled or tripled electrical power costs by using "renewables", it would only cover a small fraction of total energy use (30%).  What about the other 70%????
5. AND HOW COME TRULY RELIABLE NUCLEAR POWER (THE LATEST GENERATION DESIGNS, OR NEW THORIUM OR SMR MODULAR NUCLEAR) IS NOT BEING CONSIDERED?  SMR seems to be the most promising and more economical carbon-free energy. See here.
   

All this nonsense and hysteria is due to faulty climate models ---paid by governments. It's all a hoax. All the recent data refutes the hysterics that idiot teenagers and jokers in politics are spreading.    

Below is graphical data showing measured global temperatures compared to various climate model predictions for the past 45 years.

Actual Climate OBSERVATIONS vs. "Climate Models"

Remember, ALL climate research is paid by government or government-funded entities.  

 

If there are no "alarming situation" or catastrophic "predictions," "projections" or "results," then there is no money. It's really just a huge scam.

Governments want the public alarmed to manipulate them. Government funded entities are only happy to provide fraudulent or vastly exaggerated "headlines" that are then "parroted" or repeated by 100's of other "news outlets" to carpet the internet with the same hyperbolic claims and falsehoods.

Other relevant posts about energy:

• Large Scale Solar & Wind Power Not The Solution: Too Many Problems and Costs
• What Are The Sources of Electricity and All Other Energy in the US?
• Don't Buy the Climate Hype: Slight Global Warming Is No Cause For Alarm
• Man Has Caused Global Warming, But Forget Cap and Trade
• Cap and Trade: All About Taxing, Not Warming 
• Global Warming Made Easy
• ESG = Energy Stops Growing; an Energy Crisis is Here
• "Clean Energy" Delusions Will Take the World Back to the Dark Ages
• Climate Activist Apologizes: "Climate Change Is Happening. It’s Just Not the End of the World" 
  

US Black Domestic Terrorism is a Reality -- So Many Brutal and Violent US Blacks

Recent related posts:  

Short Takes #4: Black Murder & Crime Is Out of Control: But Dems Name 'White People' Enemy #1   
Civil War:  Democrats Announce Despicable War on US White People  
Now Back to Our Usual Black Hate Crimes and Black Urban Terrorism
Black Stupidity, Racism, Criminality and Extremism 
Destructive Minorities and Democrat's Hall of Shame   
The US is NOT a Racist Country; Except for Reverse (White & Asian) Discrimination 
Democrat Nihilism: Anti-white, Anti-male, Anti-straight, and Anti-Faith
The Anti-White Party 
Smithsonian: The Problems of Whiteness (The Real Problem is Blackness)
It's More Than Low IQ: White Culture is Rejected by Most Black Americans
Make America White Again
PCR: Democrats, the Architects of an Erased America, are the Real Enemy of our Country 
Critical Race Theory's Logical Endpoint In America: Collapse Like South Africa, Zimbabwe 
Woke-ism is a Con Job  
Short Takes #6: Persecution of Conservatives, Blacks Were the 'Muscle' in the Election Steal 

Black Lives DON'T Matter: 1000's More Blacks Dying After 2020 

 

Also see The Essential Gulfcoastcommentary Index.

While idiot Democraps and the "Joe Biden" junta call Trump Supporting Republicans "the most dangerous ideology in the country," violent US blacks are killing themselves in oustanding numbers and taking down plenty of white innocents as well.

Post "Black Brutality" from Jared Taylor at American Rennaissance

"Everyone knows violent crime is up, and there are theories about why. The George Floyd riots, police pulling back because they could ruin their lives if they do their jobs, and George Soros-funded prosecutors who keep letting violent thugs out of jail.

But I have noticed a pattern that may not fit any of these theories. Consider, for example, this hijacking in New Orleans this spring.[[ 0:29 – 0:44]] A 17-year-old boy with a pistol, along with three girls — one 16, the others 15 — stole a car with the owner in it. She got stuck in her seatbelt and was hanging out the driver’s-side door when they roared away. Her arm was ripped off and she bled to death. The carjackers were black. The victim, a 73-year-old grandmother, Linda Frickey, was white.

In Philadelphia not even a month ago, two boys and two girls between the ages of 15 and 17 — all of them black — attacked and robbed this white father of a four-year-old.

They kept beating him long after he was unconscious. His brain bled so much part of his skull had to be removed. He has memory loss, needs speech therapy, and his wife wonders what kind of father he can ever be to their boy.

Just a few days ago in Philadelphia, seven black children — the youngest was 10 — beat a 73-year-old man to death with a traffic cone. [[1:00 – 1:15]] The girl you see beating him is 14 years old. They didn’t rob him. They seem to have killed him just for the fun of it. One danced a little jig. Why were they even out at 2:30 in the morning? The victim was a black man named James Lambert.

Here’s an Orlando headline from not even two months ago: “10-year-old girl shot, killed woman after fight.”

Thirty-one-year-old Lakrisha Isaac got into a fight with 41-year-old Lashun Rogers. Lakrisha was getting the worst of it and handed a bag to her 10-year-old.

The daughter rummaged through the bag, pulled out a gun and shot Lashun twice, killing her. “You shouldn’t have messed with my mother,” the girl shouted.  Read more below:

One Armed Citizen Did in Two Minutes What One Hundred Cops Couldn’t Do in Over an Hour: Stop a Mass Killing

Greenwood Mall 'Good Samaritan' Elisjsha Dicken Who Killed Mall Shooter

Text from Chuck Baldwin, contributor to LewRockwell.com

"Can you believe that mainstream media news reports are calling the armed citizen who doubtless prevented another massacre a “good Samaritan”? Wow! Apparently even some of the brain-dead useful idiots in the media are beginning to figure this out.

Think about it: One 22-year-old armed citizen in Indiana was able to do in less than two minutes what over one hundred professional law enforcement officers in Texas were unable to do in over an hour: namely, take down a single would-be mass killer and save the lives of countless numbers of innocent people.

Of course, wanna-be tyrants on the Left are mad that this young man single-handedly prevented a monstrous tragedy. They much prefer that mass shooters succeed in their devilish desires to kill lots of people. They are not interested in saving lives; they are only interested in promoting the success of their tyrannical gun-grabbing agenda.

They are even madder that some in the media are calling the young hero a “good Samaritan.” Some of them even have the gall to condemn the hero for carrying a firearm in light of a company policy prohibiting guns in the mall. Yep! The mall was another gun-free zone—albeit the prohibition was mere company policy, not governmental law. Of course, it doesn’t seem to bother the gun Nazis that the shooter also violated mall policy."

The Bursting of China's Real Estate Bubble

From ZeroHedge and Credit Bubble Bulletin:

Suddenly a rapidly increasing number of disgruntled Chinese homebuyers are refusing to pay mortgages for unfinished construction projects, exacerbating the country’s real estate woes and stoking fears that the crisis will spread to the wider financial system.

Consider that the Chinese real estate mortgage market is the largest asset class in the entire world at about $60 Trillion USD.  See comparisons below.

The World's Biggest Financial Bubble

The mortgage strike, which kicked off in late June in a stalled Evergrande development in Jingdezhen, has rapidly grown to at least 301 projects in about 91 cities. The protests have exacerbated the country’s real estate woes and threaten to derail attempts to revive the market amid an economic slowdown. According to some estimates, millions of mortgages are now involved.

On Monday, we reported that as the pressure on Beijing rises to take measures, authorities urged banks to boost lending to builders to help complete the projects, and are also considering giving homeowners a grace period on payments.

Homebuyers’ refusal to pay mortgages stems from the widespread practice in China of selling apartments before they’re built. 

Average selling prices of properties in nearby projects in 2022 were on average 15% lower than purchase costs in the past three years, Citigroup Inc. analysts said in a note on Wednesday. China’s home prices fell for a ninth month in May, with June figures set for release Friday.

Analysts believe that a drop in home values may be another driver for the refusal to meet mortgage payments. “Investors are concerned about the spread of mortgage payment snubs to buyers, simply due to lower property prices, and the impact on property sales,” Chen wrote. 

The Fallout

The Bloomberg China Real Estate Developers Index sank 10% this week. Number one developer Country Garden’s stock collapsed 27% (down 52% y-t-d). Vanke’s stock was down 18.9%, Longfor 20%, China Jinmao 13.7%, Agile Group 15.2%, China Overseas Land & Investment 10.8%, and China Resources 9.7%.

Yet stocks are a sideshow. Country Garden bond (3 1/8% 2025) yields surged 11.5 percentage points (11,543bps) this week to a record 41.02%, with a two-week gain of over 14 percentage points (14,085bps). Longfor bond yields this week surged 13 percentage points to 116%. This is a top-five Chinese developer whose bond yields began the year around 7%. Sunac, another top developer, saw its bond yields jump 600 bps this week to 112% (began the year at 22%). And let’s not forget #3: Evergrande yields rose another 358 bps this week to 141%. Basically, the market is saying they’re all either bust or heading in that direction.

One can easily tally a Trillion dollars of liabilities from a handful of these gargantuan developers caught in a bond collapse vise. Ramifications are enormous – likely momentous. It was ominous to see Chinese developers and banks at the top of the Asia CDS leaderboard this week. Lonfor CDS surged 225 bps. Vanke, China’s fourth-largest developer, saw its CDS trade above 500 bps this week for the first time (ended week at 502 bps). Vanke CDS traded at 250 bps in mid-June and was below 100 bps back in September.

The payment refusals underscore how the storm engulfing China’s property sector is now affecting hundreds of thousands of average citizens, posing a threat to social stability ahead of a Communist Party Congress later this year. Chinese banks already grappling with challenges from liquidity stress among developers now also have to brace for homebuyer defaults. A Bloomberg Intelligence index of Chinese developer stocks slid as much as 2.7%. 

The US is to Blame for War in Ukraine

From The Space Worm at Substack:

How the incessant neo-conservative urge to reshape foreign nations in the Western image has brought us to the brink of World War.

Many know this story, but I’d like to summarize it as succinctly as possible, using only primary and establishment media sources in hopes that this article may be persuasive and shareable to friends/family of all politics. The goal is not to distract from Ukrainian suffering but to inform US citizens of how their leaders often engage in harmful foreign policy so that we may refrain from electing such leaders in the future.

Brief Background

Throughout 2012 and most of 2013, Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych had been in negotiations with the European Union on the terms of a political/trade agreement involving a sizeable loan, lowering of tariffs, and a goal to “promote gradual convergence on foreign and security matters with the aim of Ukraine's ever-deeper involvement in the European security area” (direct quote from the agreement). Putin has stated, numerous times over several decades, his concerns about Western military forces creeping closer to Russia’s border. The Ukranians asked for $160 billion to offset trade restrictions that Russia would likely implement as a result of the deal. The EU could only offer $828 million. Russia then offered Ukraine a $15 billion loan and to cut Russian natural gas prices by almost a third. Yanukovych canceled negotiations with the EU and accepted Putin’s offer. Considering the Russian loan was nearly 20 times greater than the EU loan and the agreement eliminated the possibility of Russian sanctions while leaving EU relations largely unchanged, this was a rational decision by Yanukovych. To quote Reuters, “the unwillingness of the EU and International Monetary Fund to be flexible in their demands of Ukraine also had an effect, making them less attractive partners.”

Results of 2010 election in which Yanukovych (written Janukovych) won by a slim majority almost entirely on the South-Eastern vote - Ukrainian political division falls on geographic lines.

 

The decision to cancel the EU agreement, which was not a unilateral decision by Yanukovych but a valid vote by Ukranian Parliament, was met with protests in the North-Western Capital Kiev, led by prominent members of Yanukovych’s opposition party, which quickly turned violent. Western Ukranians were understandably upset after the one-year-long negotiations fell through. By January 20, 2014, the BBC reported “Ukraine's President Viktor Yanukovych has agreed to negotiate with pro-EU protesters and opposition leaders after violent clashes in the capital Kiev.” Days later, in an attempt to quell the uprising, Yanukovych offered1 two opposition leaders key positions in his administration - prime minister to Arseniy Yatsenyuk and deputy prime minister for humanitarian affairs to Vitali Klitschko. When they declined, he repealed anti-protest laws and agreed to accelerate the presidential elections (which were due in about one year) to allow the people an opportunity to vote sooner.

Yatsenyuk tweets his rejection to joining Yanukovych’s administration

While these protests did get bloody, the systems underpinning democratic republics were functioning as intended by forcing Yanukovych to the negotiating table with his constituents and political opponents. One would think it best to let the Ukrainian people work this out, but US foreign policy officials decided otherwise.

US Intervention

A leaked phone call, believed to have taken place on January 28, 2014, between then US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt revealed that Obama-admin officials were involved in a scheme to oust Ukrainian President Yanukovych and replace his administration with Western allies. The call was discussed in several US-based media outlets though, for the most part, they refrain from discussing its content and instead focus on Nuland’s expletive remark of “Fuck the EU” and highlight that Russian hackers were likely the leak’s source. Then State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki corroborated the legitimacy of the call as she “did not dispute the authenticity of the recording and said that Nuland had apologized to European Union officials for her remarks,” according to Associated Press. Listen to full call here:

 

Here are what I believe to be the key quotes from the call and their context and implications [emphasis added]:

• (00:45) Nuland: “So I don’t think Klitschko should go into the government. I don’t think it’s a good idea. I don’t think it’s necessary.” This is followed by a distressed sigh from Pyatt and he asks for clarification, implying this is his first time hearing this. He later mentions that Nuland should speak to Klitschko one-on-one. (2:06) Pyatt: “just knowing the dynamic that’s been with them where Klitschko’s been the top dog… I think you reaching out directly to him helps with the personality management.” 

  • A couple months prior, Klitschko had announced a campaign for the presidency and early polls showed him as the most popular opposition candidate. During the time of the phone call, he was still campaigning, making headlines in US outlets:

  

  • A little over a month later, despite his populist support, Klitschko announced that he would be withdrawing from the race and running for Mayor of Kiev. It appears Nuland was successful in “corner office-ing” him out of national and into local government.

• (1:22) Nuland: “I think Yats is the guy who’s got the economic experience, the governing experience.” She’s referring to Arseniy Yatsenuk and emphasizing that he should play a leading role in the new government.

  • Less than one month later, Yatsenyuk went on to the position of prime minister.

  • Yats promptly signed the long sought-after EU trade agreement that initially started this fiasco.

  • To illustrate the new regime’s stance: almost immediately, Russian was demoted from a national language to a minority language (no longer permitting its use in courtrooms and public schools), the following year Yats called on the EU to stop the Russian Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, and Ukraine tightened immigration policy for Russian citizens entering Ukraine.

• (2:48) Nuland: “When I talked to Jeff Feltman this morning, he had a new name for the UN guy - Robert Serry… He’s now gotten both Serry and Ban Ki-moon to agree that Serry could come in Monday or Tuesday. So that would be great to help glue this thing and to have the UN to help glue it.”

  • A little under a month after this phone call, Yanukovych fled the country due to dwindling support from his allies. This prompted the Verkhovna Rada, a legislative body within the Ukrainian parliament, to publish a press release claiming itself to be “the only legitimate authority in the country”. In that same press release, “Robert H. Serry informed that the United Nations Organization ‘highly appreciates Ukraine and supports current processes.’”

  • However, the vote to impeach Yanukovych and elect new officials was illegal under the Ukrainian Constitution. To quote Huffington Post, “It is simply untrue that the Rada followed the procedure laid down in the Ukrainian constitution to impeach and remove a president from power.” For more details check out their article.

  • Pyatt also mentions the need to “get somebody with an international personality to help midwife this thing” to which Nuland replies she’s been in touch with Obama’s director of policy planning who told her that “Biden’s willing”. So, ironically, Biden himself likely played a key role in getting this vote through.

It’s fairly clear that the subject of Nuland and Pyatt’s conversation was how to influence opposition leaders and leverage ties with the United Nations to legitimize this unconstitutional vote. Such an act, by the way, falls under the definition of a Coup. 

The prescient nature of this conversation, how subsequent events played out in accordance with Nuland’s directives, implies it was not simply a brainstorm session. This was a deliberate attempt to install a Western-friendly regime into a sovereign nation - one sharing a border with Russia just 500 km from Moscow - and it was a successful attempt at that. All because US officials couldn’t settle for neutrality and self-governance; they knew better than the people of Ukraine. Jonathan Marcus of the BBC summed it up well at the time:

The US says that it is working with all sides in the crisis to reach a peaceful solution, noting that "ultimately it is up to the Ukrainian people to decide their future". However this transcript suggests that the US has very clear ideas about what the outcome should be and is striving to achieve these goals.

Consequences

These acts by the US forever changed the trajectory of Russia-Ukraine relations: The 2013 Russian trade deal was revoked, this pushed Russia into a similar deal with China a few months later, and the following years were filled with periodic announcements of Ukraine’s intentions to join NATO accompanied with showy military exercises like the NATO-sponsored ‘Clear Sky’ event held in Ukraine in 2018. 

Remember, NATO was created by the US and other Western countries in 1949 with the stated goal to “provide collective security against the Soviet Union.”  Given that the Soviet Union hasn’t existed in decades… why does NATO need to exist, let alone expand?! Tensions have continued to fester ever since, culminating in the catalytic spark of today’s conflict when president Volodymyr Zelensky implied that Ukraine might pursue nuclear weapon accumulation if international treaties were unsatisfactory. This was all the justification that Putin needed.

Putin watched in the early 2000s as seven former Soviet Union countries joined NATO. Despite promises by the Clinton administration that NATO would not keep military forces in Eastern Europe permanently, over 20 years later NATO “has about 4,000 troops in multinational battalions, backed by tanks, air defenses and intelligence and surveillance units” across Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia and Poland, according to Reuters. Putin tolerated such expansions for decades, and while it was not without complaints and retaliatory acts of his own, he clearly is not a madman intent on re-establishing the Soviet Union.

If you are a US citizen, and if, God willing, the world survives this war, then please, do not continue to tolerate these neo-conservative and neo-liberal establishment politicians. They are on both sides of the aisle - Bush’s, Clinton’s, Obama, Schumer, McConnell, Pelosi, Cheney’s, Anthony Blinken, McCain, John Bolton. It’s a special kind of hubris and naiveté to believe covert and reckless regime change operations will flourish into Western values. The Middle East has paid this price for years and now neo-con machinations are potentially putting the entire planet at risk.

Chris Rock: Niggas vs. Black People

Chris Rock from 1996. Transcript from Genius dot com

Now we've got a lot of things, a lot of racism in the world right now,  Who's more racist? Black people or white people? Black people, you know why? Because we hate Black people too! Everything white people don't like about Black people, Black people REALLY don't like about Black people.

There's some shit going on with Black people right now. There's a civil war going on with Black people, and there's two sides: there's Black people and there's niggas. The niggas have got to go. Every time Black people wanna have a good time, ignorant-ass niggas fuck it up. Can't do shit! Can't do shit without some ignorant-ass nigga fucking it up. Can't do nothing. Can't keep a disco open more than 3 weeks! Grand opening, grand closing! Can't go to a movie the first week it comes out! Why? 'Cause niggas are shooting at the screen. What kind of ignorant shit is that? "Hey, this is a good movie, this is so good I gotta bust a cap in here!"

Hey, I love black people, but I hate niggas, boy. Boy, I hate niggas. Boy, I wish they'd let me join the Klu Klux Klan! Shit, I'd do a drive-by from here to Brooklyn. I'm tired of niggas, man! You can't have shit when you around niggas. You can't have shit when you around niggas. You can't have shit! You can't have no big screen TV! You can have it, but you better move it in at 3 in the morning, paint it white, hope niggas think it's a bassinet. Can't have shit in your house! Why?! Because niggas will break into your house. Niggas that live next door to you break into your house, come over the next day and go, "I heard you got robbed." Nigga, you know you robbed me. You ain't hear shit 'cause you was doing shit!

You know the worst thing about niggas? Niggas always want some credit for some shit they supposed to do. A nigga will brag about some shit a normal man just does. A nigga will say some shit like, "I take care of my kids." You're supposed to, you dumb motherfucker! What are you talking about?" What kind of ignorant shit is that? "I ain't never been to jail!" What do you want, a cookie?! You're not supposed to go to jail, you low-expectation-having motherfucker!

Fuck man! I'm tired of this shit! You know what the worst thing about niggas? Niggas love to NOT know. Nothing make a nigga happier than not knowin the answer to your question.
Just ask a nigga a question. Any nigga! "Hey, nigga, what's the capitol of Zaire?" "I don't know that shit! Keepin' it real!" Niggas love to keep it real... Real dumb! Niggas hate knowledge. Shit. Niggas break into your house; you want to save your money? Put it in your books. 'Cause niggas don't read. Just put the money in the books. Shit, books are like Kryptonite to a nigga. "Here's a book!" "AAHHH! NO! NOT A BOOK! NO! NOOOO!" 

 

Tired of this shit, man! Your kids can't fuckin' play nowhere. Every year the space gets smaller! Okay, you can go from that corner to that corner. Oh, you can go from that gate to that gate. By the time that fucker's 10 he's just hoppin' in a circle like...

Tired of this shit, man! Tired. Tired. Tired. Fe, fi, fo, figga, boy, I hate a nigga! Boy. Tired of this shit, man! TIRED, man! Niggas just ignant. Love being... singing 'bout ignorance. I heard some song the other day, "It's the first of the month." Niggas are singing welfare carols! "On the first day of welfare my true love gave to me... I wish you a Merry Welfare and a Happy Food Stamp!"

The fuck is going on?! What the fuck is going on? Now they got some shit. They tryna get rid of welfare. Every time you see welfare in the news, they always show Black people. Black people don't give a fuck about welfare. Niggas are shakin' in they boots. "Boy, they gonna take our shit!"

Shit, a Black man that got two jobs, going to work everyday, hates a nigga on welfare. Like, "Nigga, get a job! I got two! You can't get one?! I would give your lazy ass one of mine, but you'd get fucked up and get laid off! They wouldn't hire another nigga for 10 years!"

Shit, a black woman that got two kids, going to work everyday, bustin' her ass, HATES a bitch with nine kids gittin' a welfare check. Like, bitch stop fuckin'! Stop fucking! Stop it! Put the dick down! Put it down! Get a job! Yes, you can get a job! Get a job holdin' dicks! Whatever you do, get paid to do it!

Tired of this shit, man! I'm tired! Tired. Tired. It ain't all Black people on welfare! Shit! White people on welfare too! We can't give a fuck about them! But we just gotta do our own thing.
Can't go, "Oh, they fucked up, we can be fucked up!" That's ignant! White people don't care! First of all, they try to make it look like... There ain't even that many Black people in the country. okay? Black people are ten percent of the fuckin' population. Black people are in New York, D.C., L.A., Chicago, Atlanta... Like 10 places. Okay? Ain't no Black people in Minnesota! The only black people in Minnesota is Prince and Kirby Puckett. Shit... The whole rest of the country, the other forty states, is filled up with broke-ass white people. Broke-ass, livin' in the trailer home, eatin' mayonnaise sandwiches, fuckin' they sister, listening to John Cougar Mellencamp records! Shit. Get the fuck outta here, man! And they need ya help? Naw, man!

And I see some black people lookin' at me! "Man, why you gotta say that? It ain't us, it's the media. The media has distorted our image to make us look bad! Why must you come down on us like that, brother? It ain't us, it's the media." Please cut the fuckin' shit, okay?! Okay?! Okay?! When I go to the money machine tonight, alright, I ain't lookin' over my back for the media! I'm lookin' for niggas! Shit! Ted Koppel ain't never took shit from me! Niggas have! So, you think I got three guns in my house 'cause the media outside? Oh, shit, Mike Wallace! Run!" Get the fuck outta here, man! Tired of this shit. Tired. Tired. Tired of this shit!

Luongo: The Great Awakening Continues (and Accelerates?)

From Tom Luongo at Gold, Goat 'n Guns:

When the Canadian truckers descended in peace on Ottawa protesting the vaccine mandate of Justin TrueDOH! it was obvious to many that something fundamental had changed. This wasn’t some Davos Crowd psy-op like burning down Minneapolis or a Million Vagina March.

This was a real awakening of the opposition to the Great Reset. Destroying the livelihoods of the people who bring the goods to our stores was a step too far. Even the most normalcy-biased shitlib had to do a double take at what was happening with the COVID vaccines.

How did we get here so fast?

Davos’ agenda has accelerated in recent months as major events force their hand. From Jerome Powell’s war on the offshore dollar markets to Putin choosing the whether he hangs or we drown, the pillars of their powerbase are crumbling under the weight of their ambitions.[Doug here: add to the list of WEF failures with the fall of WEF lackey Boris Johnson in the UK.]

Most people can’t conceive of what these big shifts actually mean. Sadly, they still rely on what small amount of information they get from their overlords to form their opinions. But that information has become so ludicrous, so low quality, it’s got enough people open to questions they would have never contemplated previously.

It’s a start. And once the last vestiges of trust in our media melts away, we’ll see a whole lot more than the protests we’ve seen to date.

Yes, things can get worse.

That said, the catalyst for Europe’s farmers rising up was the crazy miscalculation of Davos‘ minions TrueDOH! and his Ukrainian diaspora bagwoman Chrystia Freeland. Freezing the accounts of truckers and trampling peaceful protestors with horses woke way too many people up.

When you anger the banks, radicalize normies, and create a nationwide bank run you set a countdown timer on your rule.

First they came for the truckers to engineer a supply crisis. People supported them in droves and were trampled.

Now they came for the Dutch farmland to further engineer a food crisis and the farmers took up the Truckers’ flag.

For weeks I’ve wondered whether the spate of fires at food processing facilities all across North America were sabotage or just the natural downstream effect of overworked people and under-maintained equipment.

It’s a fair point to consider rather then just go off half-cocked about evils of Davos. Because in the end, it doesn’t matter what the truth is (likely a mixture of both), these breakdowns are all their fault anyway.

Thank that idiotic COVID policy.

But how about fertilizer train derailments?

Or a thousand dead cows from heat prostration?

When the Farmers Revolution began in the Netherlands I realized this was something deeper. And I was glad for it. The Great Awakening that began in Ottawa and spread worldwide then has metastasized into a real political nightmare for Klaus Schwab and his merry gang of nihilist midwits.

You know they are on auto-pilot seizing the land of efficient Dutch farmers. The Netherlands is routinely praised by Davos as a kind of sustainable agriculture Mecca. So why go after them? Why not further demonize American farmers. I mean everyone just knows Americans are wasteful and dirty pigs, right?

And then I came across the plans for Tristate City and, for me, it all clicked into place.

Bankrupt the farmers through legislative fiat and seize their land to build the Davos Smart City of the Future. The perfect “Capitol of the Corporatocracy.”

Try googling anything about this connection and you’ll find very little. Look at a Twitter search of “Tristate City” and come to your own conclusions.

Think Minority Report but with Germans.

Periodic Revolution

Davos’ War Against the Periodic Table continues unabated. But notice how they aren’t going after truly poisonous elements like Mercury (Hg) or Thallium (Tl) or even Arsenic (As). FYI, due to their extreme chemistry they are actually easy and cheap to deal with.

No they are going after the building blocks of life itself — Carbon (C), Hydrogen (H), Oxygen (O), Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P) and Sulfur (S), or CHNOPS.

We have the stated goal of ‘decarbonization’ worldwide.

Phosphorus and Nitrogen have been attacked relentlessly as outgrowths of the war on ‘chemical fertilizers,’ smokestack emissions, etc. for decades now.

Our entire transport industry has been made less efficient, raising the costs through unnecessary low-sulfur diesel and bunker fuel rules.

Now we’re supposed to cheer LNG-powered small dry weight tonnage ships as PROGRESS! Yeah, a $350 million boat for moving goods from Jacksonville to Puerto Rico. Brilliant!

Let’s use the most expensive fuel imaginable (liquefied methane) for shipping, an industry where fuel costs are literally everything.

But I thought fracking BAD!

All under the rubric of clean air and buzzwords like ‘sustainability.’

Now I’m all for a clean environment and dealing with real pollution which hampers human life and even the greater ecosystem/food web, but cows producing nitrogen are a part of the natural cycle of this essential element.

What’s next? Legislating away volcanoes?

Anti-Transhumanism

It’s all downstream of convincing so many people to view themselves as a pollutant and to separate human activity out as ‘not-natural.’ Think of the argument framing here and it’s very simple. Humanity is not a part of the ‘natural world.’ Our activities are not an outgrowth of ‘nature’s pure design.’

This is literally the argument about man-made Climate Change. Too bad they had to define man’s energy inputs to the environment in the most idiotic (and inaccurate) way imaginable, by ignoring more than 90% of the energy the sun and the Universe imparts to our planet.

Now add in the basic understanding that everyone has a religion, even atheists. They just turn to worshipping something else. They go from gathering in churches to courthouses, cathedrals to classrooms, and temples to tract housing.

The bottom line folks is this, “Everyone believes in something, even nihilists.”

But this anti-humanism is far worse than any ‘Original Sin’ doctrine of Christianity. There the message is that we are flawed but redeemable because we carry the spark of the divine within us. The path to enlightenment is self-discovery and self-improvement.

There the existential threat is your own legacy, nothing more. It’s an inward journey.

Now the Climate religion has merged cynically with the hubris and colonialism of Davos to create something horrific and deadly. And since they have control over the sacred texts now, they are now crusaders who will not be stopped by people refusing to comply.

You will be assimilated through the hammer and sickle masking the sword and shield.

It’s for the greater good, after all.

The memes are real, folks. We are the carbon they want to reduce. We are the livestock the think they can farm. The full force of their program to reduce us back to when we used to eat bugs to survive is here.

Is that the legacy you want to leave this world with?

If we don’t stop this here, there isn’t much room left to retreat. And if you doubt me, go talk to a farmer.

Think Global, Act Local just took on a raft of deeper meanings. It’s past time we put them into action.