Oh, and Don't Put a Black Person on Your Jury

Below is a short video from Benny Johnson at YT:

 

One of the most interesting thing about the trial was that it had an all-white jury. The prosecutor interviewed potential black jurists, but quickly found out how unsuitable they were when they admitted that they would find it difficult to convict a “brother”regardless of evidence. So the prosecutor chose the most sane course of action: have an all-white jury.

Anthony’s Family Grift

 

 

From Gatewaypundit: Anthony’s GiveSendGo page, which had already surpassed $629,000 by the time of the guilty verdict, received another $4,000 overnight, with the total still climbing before the campaign was yanked offline.

The fundraiser, titled “Help Karmelo Official Fund,” was launched shortly after Anthony’s arrest. Its stated purpose went well beyond legal defense.

The page explicitly listed funds for “safe relocation of the Anthony family due to escalating threats,” basic living costs, transportation, counseling, and “other security measures.”

By early June, as the trial got underway, the total had climbed past $612,000 and continued rising. [Doug here: But was shutdown after a guilty verdict]

Almost immediately after Anthony made bond last April, the family’s living situation visibly improved.

They moved into a $900,000 home in a gated community, with rent estimated at $3,500–$4,000 per month. Neighbors also reported the family acquiring a new car shortly after the bond release.

I really like Zuby’s YouTube Page!

Oh and Let’s Get Rid of ALL of These People:

Doug Ross: A Prescription for the Honest Liberal

From Doug Ross at Substack:

There’s a social phenomenon occurring on America’s Left. Every morning it’s the same routine: wake up, brush teeth, check phone, scream about Trump. Scroll. Scream. Retweet. Scream with better grammar. It’s like Peloton for outrage — “Feel the burn! That’s democracy leaving your body!”

And this isn’t about policy. You can argue tax rates all day. This is about manufactured outrage. It’s like they’re binge‑watching a reality show called The Orange Menace while their own cities descend into crime- and poop-filled hell-holes.

THE DIAGNOSIS: “Why the Left Can’t Look Away”

 

The picture above diagnoses why so many on the left fixate on Trump while ignoring a cascade of Democratic failures: the catastrophic Afghanistan withdrawal, the war on American energy independence, the open borders debacle, the fascination with freeing serial criminals, the economic destruction of blue zones, etc.

Six forces work together inside the mind: tribal identity, institutional capture of media and academia, algorithmic bubbles, the social reward of looking morally superior, outrage addiction, and the need to protect professional status. The coverage data shows the asymmetry isn’t imagined — it’s measurable. The key insight: a lot of anti-Trump obsessives are not mentally ill. They’re responding rationally to a system that rewards one-sided vigilance and punishes honest self-reflection.

 

This picture offers an honest path forward for liberals who want to break free from tribal reflex without abandoning their actual values. Seven concrete steps — from naming Democratic failures to reading primary sources to following respected conservatives — build the habits of real citizenship. The scenario watchlist gives readers a way to predict what’s next: either the left reforms its institutions and recovers credibility, or the obsession deepens and drives more Americans away. The real, measurable indicators to watch are media coverage parity, restored campus debate, and the return of inter-party friendship as a social norm.

Repeal the 1965 Hart-Celler Act to Restore Our Culture; We WERE a Country of EUROPEAN Immigration

Yes, we’re a country of Immigrants as people say. But they are lying to you when they conveniently forget to say that “we’re a country of nearly exclusive EUROPEAN immigration!” That distinction makes all the difference!

I’ve been railing about this for a long time:

• Dem’s Plan to to Assure Electoral Dominance: Make the US a 3rd World Shit-hole

• Goodbye White America and Western Civilization

• The US Government is now the Largest Human Trafficker In The World

The 1965 Hart-Celler Immigration Act was one of the most consequential pieces of legislation in American history.

The Hart-Celler immigration law abolished the national origins quota system, which had favored immigrants from nations with a similar heritage to our own, and opened up American immigration visas to the entire world.

While about nine in ten of the immigrants who came to the United States during the 19th and 20th century hailed from Europe, the 1965 law inverted that figure.

Today about 9 out of every 10 new immigrants brought into the country on green cards come from Latin America, Africa, Asia or the Middle East.

THIS REMAINS AN ATTACK ON WHITE, EUROPEAN CULTURE, IE., THE MOST SUCCESSFUL CULTURE IN HUMAN HISTORY

The size of the numbers also grew exponentially as well. According to Pew Research Center, 59 million immigrants entered the United States following the Act’s passage. Including their children, that added 72 million new residents to the U.S. population.

In 1965, according to Pew, the country was 84 percent white, 11 percent black, 4 percent Hispanic and less than 1 percent Asian.

In 2015, as a result of Kennedy’s immigration law, the country is now 62 percent white, 12 percent black, 18 percent Hispanic and 6 percent Asian.

Pre-1965 US Demographics

Before 1965, U.S. immigration was governed by the 1924 National Origins Act. The system was explicitly designed to maintain the existing ethnic and cultural balance of the country:

• Immigration was, by design, to be overwhelmingly from Europe.
• In the decades leading up to 1965, roughly 85–90% of immigrants were from Europe (mostly Northern and Western Europe).
• The United States in 1960 was approximately 85–88% White (European descent), with Blacks around 11%, and Asians/Hispanics making up very small percentages.
• The country was majority Christian, with a strong European cultural core.

What the 1965 Act Did

• Sponsored by Emanuel Celler (Jewish Congressman) and heavily lobbied by Jewish organizations (ADL, American Jewish Congress, HIAS).
• Abolished the national origins quota system.
• Replaced it with a system based primarily on family reunification (chain migration) and some skills-based preferences.
• The public sales pitch was “fairness” and ending “discrimination.” The actual long-term effect was a massive shift in the source countries of immigration.

The Demographic Transformation (The Numbers)

 

The results were dramatic and predictable:

• Pre-1965: ~85–90% of immigrants European.
• Post-1965: Immigration flipped. The majority now came from Latin America, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.
• From 1965 to today, legal immigration + chain migration + illegal immigration has added tens of millions of non-European immigrants and their descendants.
• U.S. White (non-Hispanic European descent) population share dropped from ~85–88% in 1960 to roughly 58–60% today (Census Bureau data).
• Projections (Census Bureau and Pew): Whites become a minority (~47% or less) by 2045–2050.
• Hispanic population exploded from ~4% in 1960 to ~19% today.
• Asian population from under 1% to ~6–7%.
• Black population remained relatively stable as a percentage (~13%), but the overall non-European share skyrocketed.

This was not an accident of neutral policy. It was demographic engineering that deliberately shifted the country away from its historic European/Christian core toward a more diverse, less cohesive population.

How This Fits the Long March of Marxism

We’ve mapped this as a core strategic goal of Cultural Marxism: weaken the historic American nation by changing its people.

A more diverse, less culturally unified population is easier to manage through grievance politics, government dependency, and identity-based division. The 1965 Act was the legislative hammer that made it possible on a massive scale.

The same networks that pushed the Act (heavy Jewish organizational involvement in lobbying) had been fighting European-preference immigration since the 1920s. They succeeded in 1965, and the long-term consequences are exactly what we see today: a dramatically different country demographically, culturally, and politically.

This is not “diversity is our strength” in neutral terms. It was a deliberate shift in the ethnic and cultural composition of the United States that eroded the historic White/Christian majority that built the country.

PCR: Erasure of White Civilization Gathers Speed

From Paul Craig Roberts

As we saw from the complicity of the British police in the murder of Henry Novak by an immigrant-invader, the decades of propaganda that white people are racists has been successful.

The suppression of white people by white governments is not limited to official indifference to their rape and murder. It applies across the board. For example, the British are no longer permitted to have historical figures on their currency, and Americans are being dispossessed of their language by diversity.

The Bank of England has decided that historical figures such as Winston Churchill are “elitist and divisive” and is removing Churchill’s image from the 5 pound banknote.

The Bank of England’s decision to deep-six Britain’s famous wartime leader is based on nothing more than a study by a market research firm called Savanna which concluded that Churchill, Alan Turing who broke the Nazi Enigma Code, and novelist Jane Austen were “imperialistic, potentially divisive and elitist.” The news report doesn’t name the fool who commissioned the “study” or say why an 18th century novelist whose work has remained popular for centuries is imperialistic, divisive, and elitist, or why a code breaker is, or why Churchill who held his country together during a difficult war is suddenly divisive.

The answer seems to be that they are white. The handful of woke idiots who conducted the review of banknote images wanted “more inclusive” images on England’s money, and a handful of anti-white woke morons made a decision to erase British history. In the West’s “democracies,” all decisions are imposed from above.

The market research firm concluded that British landmarks and historic architecture, especially buildings from the Georgian and Victorian eras, are too divisive because of their links colonialism to be on banknotes as are the White Cliffs of Dover, an image that could suggest racist opposition to immigrant-invaders. It is taken for granted that the only reason for opposing immigrant invasion is racism.

Once again we see multiculturalism destroying nations and their history.

Multicultural countries lack the unity that patriotism requires. Who will fight for a country without identity? Americans are even being stripped of their language. For many years every time an American calls a bank, utility company, service provider or just about anyone, he has to listen to machines answering in Spanish and English. I have reported the large numbers of languages that government offices, such as Social Security and Medicare, brag about being able to use for communication. And now banks with NY City accounts have had to notify their New York City account holders pursuant to New York City regulations to notify the banks of their “language preference” for their account information, another advance for “diversity,” which means disunity. White American families have disappeared from corporate ads. Black men are with white women, white men are with Asian or Hispanic women. The children are what once were called half breeds. Today the term is regarded a a racial slur, which implies that there is something wrong with being a half breed. If so, why is an euphemism for the term any less of a slur?

What is a country without its own language, its own history, common values and mores, and racial unity? The answer is that it is not a country. It is a tower of babel. How long before the historic buildings in Britain and Europe have to be pulled down because of their association with whiteness? If statues, Shakespeare, and Jane Austin can be deep-sixed, so can be all artifacts of Western civilization.

There is plenty of room for diversity in the world, but not within a country. Diversity within a country destroys the country. We are witnessing and experiencing the destruction of every Western country. We are living it and are impotent to stop it.