In it, he argues that Western civilization is being rapidly taken over by a psychopathological religion, and that we must resist it by exposing it for what it is, and re-grounding our institutions in love of humanity, civilization, and freedom.
Shellenberger's work covers a wide range of topics, but a common theme is the distortion of history and censorship benefiting the powerful.
In this emotional address, Shellenberger discusses the negative effects of censorship, rewriting history, and the power dynamics it serves.
He highlights disparities between the real-world and the one we are delivered by authorities and 'experts - pointing out the decline in deaths from natural disasters and the fact that police killings in the US, including those of African-Americans, have declined over the years - among others, emphasizing the need for seeking out accurate information.
Shellenberger criticizes the selective disinformation campaigns and censorship surrounding topics like COVID-19, vaccines, and the Hunter Biden laptop; and argues that society is moving towards a new moral order centered around race, victimhood, and identity politics, creating a culture of entitlement and grandiosity.
Finally, Shellenberger points out the presence of narcissistic and psychopathic behavior in positions of power, calling for courage in confronting these cluster B personality types and emphasizes personal responsibility, optimism, and the need to fight for positive change while avoiding toxic ideologies.
As Shellenberger writes at his Public Substack:
"You can hear the emotion in my voice. The global crackdown on free speech has left me feeling angry and afraid. Despite my emotional state, or perhaps because of it, the students gave me a standing ovation at the end."...
"It’s not enough to condemn, we must also seek to understand, and explain. We are going toe-to-toe with an opponent that would put us in prison for wrongthink. We must stand up to their bullying, and break their hyponotic trance over the population. That is how we will escape from the woke matrix.”
Now, The Rough Transcript ( from His YouTube Video above and “fixed” by myself):
Thank you very much, What a great pleasure to be here.
You've all heard the news: climate change is destroying your future. Carbon dioxide is accumulating the atmosphere. The planet has warmed 1.1 degrees Centigrade since the pre-industrial period. Global warming is killing the Great Barrier Reef.
We also know that police killing black people is a pandemic. Murders of trans people nearly doubled
over the past four years. But there's more to this story.
Carbon emissions peaked in Great Britain over 50 years ago. The same thing in France, the United States and indeed over the last decade total Global emissions declined. Why haven't you read that in the New York Times or the Washington Post?
Deaths from natural disasters have diminished to a few hundred a year in the United States even as the global population quadrupled over the last century. They've declined internationally by over 90 percent.
The cost of disasters everywhere is on decline. Why is nobody telling you that?
As a result of declining deaths from extreme weather events and declining costs, what gets counted as a natural disaster has also declined. There's only one database that tracks natural disasters.
It's the mdata center in Belgium and total global weather and climate disasters have declined. How come nobody is saying that?
The Great Barrier Reef recorded the highest amount of coral in 36 years and maybe longer because that's the amount of time that we've been studying the Coral on the Great Barrier Reef. Why is nobody telling you that?
These are my books. After I lost all of my friends and all of my financial support, it was not a intuitive move in your late 40s. I decided to put all my heartbreak into a single book; Apocalypse Never, which came out in 2020. I had the Good Fortune of it selling and so I got to write a follow-up book which was to understand the following: why do people who say they care more than anybody else let people suffering from schizophrenia smoke Fentanyl and have the bottom parts of their legs rot on the street where they are then taken into the hospital and have the bottom parts of their legs amputated. Why did they then put them back on the street?
Why do we spend 10 times more than other cities on homelessness and have those outcomes? How is that compassionate? And why is it done in the name of care?
There are no racial differences in police killings when accounting for whether or not the suspect was armed or a threat, justified or unjustified. Everybody knows this. There's no real debate about the data. The one person has done the most to discover this is Roland Friar at Harvard University. You might have heard of Harvard University? And yet nobody talks about this.
Police killings of African-Americans declined from 217 per year in the 1970s to 157 per year in the 2010s in 58 of the largest U.S cities. That's based on FBI data that my colleagues and I personally crunched.
This is wonderful news!
Police killings of all races declined dramatically from 59 per year between 1970 to 1975, to 12 per year. Now the rate of police killings in San Francisco and Oakland did increase slightly, from 2.7 to 2.8 per year respectively in the 70s to 2.4 and 3.9. But police killings per capita in those two cities declined by 8.3 percent; when you account for the increase in population it also declined.
Researchers do not know if trans people are being killed disproportionately in comparison to cisgender people. Nor do they know if trans homicides are rising or if trans people are being killed for being trans or for some other reason.
There is no debate over this data. And yet CBS News irresponsibly and other news outlets suggest that they are, and that should upset you especially if you care very much about trans people. Because what you would not want to do is have a bad baseline for monitoring such terrible forms of violence.
Why in the world does everybody get it so horribly wrong, horribly wrong, unethically wrong not just analytically wrong????
Some of these things are easier to explain than others.
There have been major disinformation campaigns waged by senior leaders in our government. They instigated an entire FBI investigation based on a made-up memo that suggested that Putin controlled Trump because prostitutes urinated on him in a bed. My mother still believes that Trump is a Russian asset because of that disinformation campaign.
Labs leak all the time and have leaked for 50 years all around the world. The idea that Covid might have leaked from a lab was obvious to everybody including the scientists who emailed Anthony fauci on January 30th 2020. In their email to him they said we think it's more likely to be a lab leak.
Several days later Fauci perpetuated a disinformation campaign that suggested that you were a racist for suggesting that the covid-19 virus came from a lab but not a racist if you thought it came from Chinese people eating bats. That happened!
People said it was misinformation to suggest that vaccines had side effects. People said that the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation. Not that it fell into a bathtub because Hunter Biden was hammered and smoking crack.
Instead somehow the Russians had gotten Hunter Biden's laptop data and then got it onto a laptop and then dropped it off at a computer repair store. It was the most cockamami story, a conspiracy theory, and it was perpetuated by senior members of the U.S government both retired and employed.
And people say that the Twitter files just showed people doing content moderation not censorship. These are senior elected officials who carried out this disinformation campaign. We now know absolute certaintly that the FBI should never have launched that probe.
Here's the email from the senior scientist to Fauci. It said: some of the features potentially look engineered. The Furin (sp?) cleavage site that does not belong on the spike protein was obviously engineered and people knew that right away. And yet the Washington Post suggested that Tom Cotton keeps repeating a coronavirus Fringe theory that scientists have disputed.
The original headline which Washington Post changed, without acknowledging it on their article, said that he was spreading a debunked conspiracy theory. The Washington Post, which broke the famous Watergate scandal, spreads disinformation.
Fauci and his colleagues constructed a fake science article in one of the greatest, the formerly greatest medical journals (Lancet) in the world, suggesting conspiracy theories were what those lab Leak hypotheses were. The Great Barrington, declaration co-authored by a new friend, Jay bhattachary of Stanford University that Jay bhattacharya is a fringe epidemiologist: a full professor at Stanford University and one of the most beautiful individual people you'll ever meet.
And Francis Collins, the head of the National Institutes of Health, the greatest medical organization in the world, now formerly greatest, said that there needs to be a quick and devastating published takedown of his premises.
The Great Barrington declaration argued that the approach to the pandemic should have been the approach to the pandemic that everybody agreed upon before there was a pandemic --ie., "focused protection" of the most vulnerable but allowing children to go to school so they could actually learn something.
I don't want to make it personal but you do need to name names when you are uncovering bad behavior and this person, Renee Diresta, is the smartest of the people in every room she's in, and she's a former CIA fellow --ostensibly former.
One of the things that you learn when you interview people in the intelligence communities is that they say nobody retires from the intelligence community. Nobody retires.
This (she) is a person who ran a censorship operation, with U.S taxpayer dollars, that involved the Department of Defense, the National Science Foundation, the Department of Homeland Security.
It subcontracted out the censorship work to four organizations that was constituted by the creme de La Creme people; that went to places like Harvard and Stanford and apparently had their consciences ripped out from their hearts and their brains and got themselves in a situation of censoring the rabble, or what Hillary Clinton calls "the deplorables," for doing things like questioning the elections or sharing stories of vaccine side effects on Twitter and Facebook.
This was such a smashing success that they're now exporting to other countries. And there's nothing that's been done to stop this. Our work has not stopped this.
What Twitter did to Jay Bhattacharya -- they put him on a blacklist. The word Blacklist is not my word -- that's the Twitter internal word. You can see it right there in yellow on his profile.
You can imagine the shock that overcame Barry Weiss, Matt Taibbi and I when we saw this. He's one of the most important epidemiologists in the world and he was on a black list just because he suggested "doing things in the pandemic that everybody agreed we should do during the pandemic -- before there was a pandemic."
The behavior from the White House was remarkable. Thuggish would describe it, or bullying. Rob Flaherty in particular who sent this email to Facebook and got this response back from Facebook whose names we shielded--not the not the public officials --whose names should be known--and the Facebook executive said yes sir, yes sir please know that we are censoring even true stories of vaccine side effects; so mothers sharing stories of their children getting sick from the vaccine had their posts censored without their knowledge so that other mothers would not see them. This happened. And there's no debate about that this happened.
There's a lawsuit about this and the only question is only whether it violated the First Amendment
It's still in my humble view as a non-first Amendment scholar. a violation of the First Amendment to have the government have other people demand the censorship or to demand that Facebook engage in the censorship.
Matt Taibbi discovered that, in this email from the virality project, which was a project funded by U.S government contractors, that they demanded that Twitter censor true content which might promote vaccine hesitancy.
It's not that the information was wrong because (of course the first amendment also protects wrong information), but they wanted to censor accurate information because they were worried that people might get the wrong (right?) idea and choose not to get the vaccine!
I got the vaccine. I got boosted. Vaccines are a miracle but this is totalitarian tactics to censor this kinds of information.
"The FBI came to us" said Mark Zuckerberg, as he has rapidly sought to shift the blame away from taking responsibility, the FBI came to us and we're like 'hey you should be on the high alert, we thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda 2016 election." "There's about to be some kind of dump similar to that."
He's referring to the FBI coming to them to say that they should be ready to censor the hunter Biden laptop. But that's weird because there had been no publicity of the hunter Biden laptop yet. Perhaps it's just a coincidence that the FBI had been sitting on the hunter Biden laptop for uh almost a year.
And this wasn't the beginning. Twitter was under intense pressure. We have seen a sustained effort by the intelligence Community to push us to share more info and change our IP API policies. They're probing and pushing everywhere they can -- including by whispering to Congressional staff --complained the Twitter director of policy on January 2020.
The story exploded on Oct 14th. Twitter's internal trust and safety dept, which is the censorship department at Twitter, evaluated the New York Post article and they they concluded that it did not violate Twitter's terms of service that the article was entirely ---there was no evidence that it was inaccurate or that it was a result of hacking.
They censored it anyway.
Here's the subpoena from the FBI confiscating the laptop in December 2019 of almost a year before the New York Post story. Here's the signature by Hunter Biden on the receipt dropping the laptop off at the computer computer repair store after he had dropped it in the bathtub or the pool.
Weirdly enough, in the Twitter files, we discovered that there had been preparation for how to NOT cover the hunter Biden laptop story months before the New York Post published an article about the Hunter Biden laptop!
What's the Aspen Institute doing gathering journalists to talk about how NOT to cover a story that hadn't even broke yet! What is going on here? Why is it that they were programming journalists to disregard the one of the most important journalistic principles that's been in place for over 50 years? It's known as the Pentagon Papers principle and it's as follows:
"If a whistleblower comes to you and they have documents showing that the Pentagon knows that they're losing the war in Vietnam that the New York Times And The Washington Post shall publish those documents because that's important to the public interest and God damn it it's protected by the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution. That is what journalists did in the New York Times & The Washington Post published that that article depending on papers they won their pulitzers for it they defended it in court and they won at the Supreme Court."
Steven Spielberg thought it was such an amazing story he made a movie about it.
The Aspen Institute, with Stanford, with U.S federal government money has been attacking this -- saying don't cover the material cover the person who leaked it!
You might remember that they disparaged Daniel Ellsberg --the Nixon folks -- because he'd been going to a psychotherapist so they tried to suggest he was a crazy person. That tactic is now being used by Democrats to disparage anybody who leaks information central to the public interest -- like how's the war in Ukraine going.
Interests that we share that are public interests that are protected by the first amendment is precisely why the people that created our country demanded that there be the First Amendment to the Constitution. They didn't want the Constitution to even be in place, they didn't want a United States of America, unless there was a First Amendment! That's how important it was. That's why they made it the FIRST amendment.
It's now being attacked by the people who claim to be the Defenders of liberalism and democracy. It's being attacked right now. Here's the little memo they created you can see at the top September 2020 at Aspen digital hack and dump working group how to get how to brainwash journalists so they don't cover the obvious thing that's sitting in front of their face. It's all done in the name of protecting people--fragile people who need to be protected from information which is so dangerous.
Here's Twitter's top censor Joel Roth. "He said you know we got to get to Jack Dorsey the CEO we got to convince him. We gotta we gotta start by censoring without anybody knowing it... information that directly causes harm."
Now they're trying to read your text messages.
Pierre Omidyar, who made his money on eBay, spinning off a defense department technology. They're now trying to read your encrypted text messages and they're trying to create something called tip lines to turn everybody into little narcs. Why, you don't need the Stasi, you just have each other to go and report on your 'wrong think" to the FBI or the CIA or whatever,
Jacinda Arden the prime minister of New Zealand who was so unpopular because her coveted policies were so wrong & hurt so many people. She's been picked up by Harvard to head up their censorship initiative. She's working with Facebook and Google to do it globally. It's much easier now to censor because there's only two important platforms maybe just one Facebook and Twitter.
I mean imagine having to censor hundreds of newspapers you don't have to do that anymore you can just censor Twitter and Facebook !!!!
It's much worse than you think. A whistleblower told me, who works for all the social media companies, there's a complex for cancellations and pressure campaigns are well organized by outside groups. It's a total conflict waged in every school business and platform. It's conspiracy? is it a culture? yes. Conspiracy means to breathe together.
It's cancel culture with an inorganic overlay that we call the censorship industrial complex. This is here it has arrived it's in place. Our job now is simply to dismantle and defund it.
So how did this happen? What was going on here? Propaganda according to Jacob and his great book draws on existing values we want to move Beyond racial discrimination, we want to move Beyond discrimination against sexual minorities, and so they tap into that so you're it. Propaganda is about controlling the information environment. The concern of the advocates of disinformation isn't to wipe out every instance of a piece of information. Hunter Biden laptop story got out there but people like myself and my my mother and everybody in my liberal family all thought it was Russian disinformation so the censorship was in service of the disinformation, they know they can't be total they don't need to be total they just need to brainwash you into thinking that something is wrong when it's right.
What is going on in 2010? something happens? uh Zach Goldberg at the Manhattan Institute finds that the terms racist and racism just exploded into the news media in this period and little surprise then that the ideology follows how big of a problem is racism it's a much bigger problem than people have thought.
People thought it was a declining problem for years people we thought that relationships between white and black Americans have been pretty good; 70 percent since the last 20 years. And then the stats for “good relations between the races” just plummet after you're told repeatedly through propaganda that things have gotten worse somehow.
Some of this is just the Elites in an absolute Panic after the Revolutions of 2016, brexit and Trump. They had to get control of the information environment. They had to be able to wage war when they wanted to wage war.
They had all these overproduction of Elites sitting around after they successfully prosecuted the war on terror. They needed something to do. They turned inwards and they tapped into cancel culture what we call wokism as predicates for censorship.
Why though? why? Why can't we just live in peace and have debates and Free Speech.
Part of it I think has to do with the fact that nobody believes in God-- we don't have the traditional value systems that we used to have. It’s been declining. This is a very old trend. This is what Friedrich Nietzsche wrote about in the mid 19th century; the death of god. We don't believe. We don't have traditional moral structures. The percentage of Americans with no religious identity has risen dramatically.
Ernest Becker and His Brilliant Pulitzer prize-winning 1975 book said "man cannot endure his smallness unless he can translate it into meaningfulness." The idea that we just die and turn into worm food is pretty depressing particularly if you think that your life isn't very exciting or interesting.
So we overcompensate by constructing monuments to our lives we can rest assured knowing that our names will live on these are called immortality projects and there's absolutely nothing wrong with them particularly if you sublimate and create beautiful immortality projects the idea of death, the fear of it, haunts the human animal like nothing else. It's like a mainspring of human activity designed largely to avoid the fatality/finality of death to overcome it by denying in some way that it is the final Destiny of man we deny it we sublimate it we create monuments we write books we lead political campaigns.
But things can go terribly awry when we're outside of a of a positive moral framework. The problem of disbelieving in God is Not That Man ends up believing in nothing. It's much worse. He ends up believing anything.
Climate change, a new external Authority you used to get right by God now you get right by Nature. You used to feel guilty for Adam and Eve eating from the Tree of knowledge,” now you feel guilty that we started using fossil fuels and technology and nuclear power and modern agriculture we're guilty guilty guilty guilty
Nature's angry at you. It wants to punish you. There's no Redemption but you might avert narrowly apocalypse by harmonizing with nature through Renewables and Organics.
Power has GOT to move from your local authorities, it's got to move from the people you vote for to the people that you don't vote for--- to the experts in places like Brussels and the United Nations and International Energy--to people who know how to get you right by Nature.
We have a new priest class and we have a new set of witches. Race is the new moral order. We know it used to be people of color. but that wasn't precise enough now we know it's bypoc so it's black indigenous people to rule over Latinos and Asians on the moral hierarchy.
It's got to be clear. You've got to feel guilty. There's no redemption really, but you can get right by the new moral order by knowing your place. Get in your place. Know your race. Get in your place
It's not about equal justice under the law anymore that's an old idea now it's we're gonna we're gonna have the laws enforced differently Canada's pioneering is California is pioneering this. We should be ruled by the victims. We can figure out who was victimized the most and they should have the most power!
There's a new set of witches, a new view of human nature you do have a soul-- it's called your gender. You're the god. You can change your body however you like. Forget what they say about chromosomes and whatnot. You can reshape your body. You are who you say you are. Drugs and surgery are gender-affirming preventing drugs and surgery is conversion therapy and we have a new set of witches. Social media plays a role.
Look at that Jonathan height is absolutely right anybody that's been reading Jonathan height knows that he's won this argument. You got it John. stop you've convinced everybody.
You've made us all anxious we feel like oh my God everybody's watching me everyone can see me it's Foucault's panopticon it's on your phone everybody can see I'm they can see I might be a bad person I better get on the side of the bullies to protect myself. I better participate in the attacks on the witches or I might be victimized. Anxiety anxiety.
We see the rise of cluster B personality disorders which are described as four different manifestations some people think there's just a single. It doesn't matter. DSM anti-social, borderline, histrionic, narcissistic.
I'm not diagnosing anybody. That's not what I'm about to do. But you see the behaviors and they they're recognizable to you. The greatest scholar of narcissism, Sam Vaknin, he says I'm a narcissist so take my word for it. Listen to me. and Sam is brilliant .
He says: "certain people are prone to adopt victimhood as an identity. Victimhood endows their life with meaning. You know this type of person. They would be victims even in situations where have not been victimized." They want to be victimized. look at me! I'm a victim! I have higher moral status than you because of it.
So entitlement grandiosity. I'm entitled to tell you what to do because I'm more of a victim than you. Splitting; you're either with me or against me. I need the attention. Give it to me! Impaired reality. Lack of empathy for oppressors and excessive empathy for victims. It's very dangerous if you're a perennial victim this is your identity you would tend to develop attendant behaviors.
If you don't get special treatment you'll become aggressive.
You know what these folks are like. You feel like you're walking on eggshells around them. You're anxious around them. Splitting--- everyone says there is no black and white issue said Greta Thunberg but I think this is--- either we go on as a civilization, or we don't!! We must stop using fossil fuels right now or you're a bad person!
The infiltration of Narcissists and Psychopaths is universal in all these victimhood movements. They become the public face of the movement. If you're going to go and celebrate your status by not wearing a mask and wearing a beautiful ball gown and everyone else is wearing masks then you better explain that and you better explain why you're demanding that children wear masks in schools.
What would lead otherwise decent people, I have no doubt, that the people with their fists upheld are are empathic people, caring people. They care more. What would lead them to do this: to raise their fists above this young woman who later said in the Washington Post oped that she attended black lives matter protests she supports police reform. She just didn't think that she should have to raise her fists against a mob.
That that's not what she understood the first amendment in America to be about. If an individual in a position of political powers a psychopath he or she can create an epidemic of Psychopathology in people who are not essentially Psychopathic. They're not Psychopaths. They're behaving like Psychopaths. they create a culture of cluster B personality disorders.
These are not the signs that people want to censor. They want to censor other people's signs. The signs that say respect trans people or your pronouns will be "was"/ "were" That's a death threat. That poster just went up in Britain today. The potential for aggression and victimhood movementsis much larger than the general population. Anything that is grievance-based leads to violence and death. These "Boots Stomp Turfs."
If you start talking about a genocide against you and your folks and there's no genocide be very careful around these folks. that's dangerous. Because if you think a genocide is been perpetuated against your people, then almost anything is justified.
These are anti-social personalities and personality behaviors these kinds of things; assaulting somebody for what they said. It's narcissism! Pay attention to me! I threw soup on a van Gogh painting. In the 1950s, these courageous students had milkshakes poured on their heads in order to sit peacefully at a lunch counter in the south. Now they throw soup on the painting and they want to be famous. That's different motivations. That's not the same thing. Histrionic. My future's coming to an end! It's desperate! It must happen now! It's tempting to wonder is it all coming to an end. Is this it? It's pretty dark.
I never said it was going to be an uplifting speech. Civilizations on average 336 years. We're at 250. It's been a good run. It's the United States of America. This place is amazing. Amazing. We have the First Amendment we have a First Amendment and we're going to fight for it, right?
We're country of renewal. We're a country -- we want change. You can remake yourself. Somehow I became a free speech. I was like a nuclear power advocate like five minutes ago!
The Netherlands was one of the first modern civilizations. It's still great. God have you been to Amsterdam? They had an open drug scene and homeless crisis like we have and they got people the care they needed. They got them into treatment, they intervened, got them on methadone, got them into recovery. Amsterdam is amazing. It's an old civilization and they're doing great.
You need at least these four things: 1) Equal justice under the law 2)meritocracy, 3)cheap energy and 4)freedom of speech. If you don't have them you might be able to get away with the first three but then it's not a liberal democracy. If it's just the first three.
So what do we do about it you can't just condemn my friends on the Right-- they love to condemn condemn condemn condemn. It's not good enough. You have to explain it. That's what I've been trying to do.
This is the most important book I've read on this issue in the last couple years. The author lived under the Nazis, lived under Communism in Poland; a psychologist and he said "it's not just that totalitarianism --especially the institutions-- are immoral and wrong it's all yes that's true but the people in charge-- they're Psychopaths and narcissists." There's something wrong with the people that it got in charge. It's a "pathocracy." he said. It's a sick bureaucracy. You've got to get those people out. You can't have Psychopaths and narcissists running your government.
Naturally we should take care when confronting monsters lest we not become them ourselves. For me having come back to my faith, this is the most important challenge. You've heard "love your neighbor and hate your enemy" but I tell you love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you. I can't do this but it makes me better to try.
And I came back to it when trying to figure out how do you deal with sick personalities like the cluster B personalities. It's not going to work if we hate them. It's going to take some courage. Some people are starting to show it. So thrilled Glenn Lowry's here Glenn, I'm such a fan.
Peter Pagosian my new friend doesn't believe in God but strong, strong moral character a man of Courage horrible things were done to Peter and he is a better person for it and overcame it. That's how you deal with victimization. You're not trying to avoid being a victim you're seeking to overcome your victimization---that's the heroic Journey.
We're mortal this is it guys. Even if you think you're going to go on afterwards, as I do, is not going to be this life again you might be 19 you have a lot of years ahead of you you're not going to be 19 again what are you going to do when you're 19 what are you going to do now? are you going to be brave or not? it's usually pretty clear actually. you just got to do the work too you know uh you got to just debunk the bad stuff you just gotta say it's wrong you got to debunk it you gotta do it on Twitter you got to do it in your books um it works. You know they start saying hatred is increasing everywhere it's increasing in California, really like compared to like when like the 50s or 500 years ago? There's less hatred among Common People of racial religious and sexual minorities than at any time in recorded history. I mean seriously.
So let's go look at the data. I'm not very good at math or statistics at all, but I'm familiar with the what's known as uh "recording bias". You start recording a phenomenon you get better at recording the phenomenon you have to get better at accounting for your your getting better at recording it so we're better at recording it that's all this is and they keep doing it.
I mean look at these numbers guys..... I mean like have you ever met anybody that doesn't think black and white people should be allowed to get married? But yet in 1961 four percent thought that that it should be legal.
Americans are fundamentally optimistic people so, despite the propaganda, despite the misinformation, we think it's actually going to get better. So go read the footnotes and debunk that stuff.
"There could be an increase in reporting that might have been the reason" said the researcher who put out the bullshit study at UC Berkeley. The first thing you learn in your stats class is that there's a reporting bias. Come on just debunk that stuff and then go "why are you doing that?" "Why are you trying to make it seem like there's more hatred?" "what are you doing?" "who gives you the right?" "how dare you!"
If there's more anti-Semitism in the society I want to know, but if you start telling me that there's more anti-Semitism in society and there's really NOT more anti-Semitism in society, shame on you!! That's terrible! 'You need to explain why you did that."
oh such important newspapers the New York Times and Financial Times. I used to want to be in those papers I went oh right to the op-eds for the New York Times and financial times---so much status and Prestige!
Look at the garbage they do on the left; "oh look at the number of hurricanes are going up because the climate change!" Look we just put the data in there. You should be able to debunk this in minutes. Train yourself to do it and do it quickly. Make it a competition; first one to debunk it wins! you get to go viral on Twitter! That's your reward: status.
There's nothing wrong with status okay go get your status for the right things. Go get your status for your courage and your Acuity and your speed and your and your care and your compassion.
The NYT is Total utter bullshit; They cherry-picked post 1980 period to mislead the readers the New York Times on the left. And then they did the exact same thing with the "hate data," Misrepresenting better hurricane detection. What do you think happened over the last hundred years have you heard of satellites? You know how good satellites are at detecting hurricanes? Really freaking good. They don't miss a hurricane. Imagine 1900 you're on Shore "is there a hurricane out there." "I don't know!" Maybe.The New York Times published that. They did not correct it. And I made sure that the author saw it and they saw it. Landfalls of U.S hurricanes are flat!
This is the data. There's no other data source. it actually slightly declines but it's probably not accurate because the data is the data--it's a little bit messy--- but it's flat there's no increase of hurricanes.
There's still two and a half billion people in the world that have to use wood and dung to get their primary energy. That is bullshit. There is no reason for that. These people can get LPG and gas. You interview women in the third world and you're like "what do you like about getting LPG being able to cook a little pot of beans or rice as opposed to having to go get the wood and blow on the fire and breathe the smoke?" What they say. "You know when you get a little LPG and get the beans and the rice going you can do something else, you can save labor, you can save your time cheap energy is women's Liberation."
The fact that some of the richest and most powerful people in the world are trying to deprive sub-Saharan Africans and South Asians of natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas is a moral abomination. It's completely messed up. That's what's going on right now. They/we can lift everybody out of poverty. There's no physical reason you can't do it. It's just mental derangement that we can't.
You grow more food on less lands as we do in Europe and the United States! And there's more grasslands and forests for the wild animals. There's no sixth mass extinction. You can have everybody lift out of poverty and have more nature! oh my God! It's incredible, I mean, think about it-- on your Death Beds--maybe not mine like there's no reason for anybody to be in poverty anymore. That's dumb and you have more wild animals gorillas and turtles! We're bringing the sea turtles back.
This is the future we can have we just have to fight for it let's do it thank you very much thank you very much thank you guys appreciate you thank you very much thank you guys
Questions and Discussion:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please send me your message or comments. Thanks in advance.